The Hebrew title for this portion means "The Life of Sarah," and yet the narrative commences at her death. True, we can only measure a person's life fully once he or she has died; yet it still seems odd.
We find some clues to the title in the story that follows. Abraham secures Sarah's burial ground, purchasing the Cave of Machpelah (making the Torah a title deed for the Jewish people to the holy city of Hebron). He also secures a wife for his son, sending his servant to find Rebecca. In a scene that will be repeated in several subsequent courtships (Jacob and Rachel, Moses and Zipporah), the maiden appears at a well and demonstrates her generosity by offering water to Eliezer -- and to his animals as well.
In that sense, the narrative is about the "life" of Sarah because it demonstrates that her legacy, both physical and moral, continued long after her death. That, in a sense, is the true measure of a life: what it creates, the legacy a human being leaves behind.
The accompanying additional reading, or Haftarah, is from Kings I 1:1-31, and tells the story of David's passing, as he confirms his promise to give the kingdom to Solomon, the son of Bathsheba. Though David's love with Bathsheba was conceived in lust, and in sin, it had a Divine purpose -- one of several such examples in the Old Testament.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
