Elections are tough to explain because there is basically one data point and a zillion variables. But one variable that was entirely within the Democrats' control was the decision not to pass the $1.2 trillion "infrastructure" bill and to hold out for a $3.5 trillion "reconciliation" bill on a variety of government programs.
The bill was written by socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and adopted by President Joe Biden as the embodiment of his once-moderate-sounding "Build Back Better" agenda. It was a bait-and-switch, because Biden and his party took everything that they had cut out of the infrastructure bill in a negotiation with Republicans and simply stuck it in the "reconciliation" bill. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi joined the "progressives" in the House in insisting that the "reconciliation" bill had to precede the "bipartisan" infrastructure bill.
But Democrats could not agree among themselves, and the left would not compromise, and so Biden left for Europe last week ahead of the election, with neither bill having passed, and nothing to show the electorate.
Cue the civil war: moderates will claim that the left ruined the party's prospects, and the left will claim that moderates dampened enthusiasm among the base.
The big loser here, surprisingly, is Pelosi, once admired for her political acumen. She failed to steer a bill to passage, and looks headed to defeat in 2022.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
