When the history of this era is told, the January 6 committee and the two impeachments of the president will sit amongst the most egregious abuses of civil liberties in our times. In all of these cases, the common denominator is the attack on due process rights, which has been a feature of left-wing politics since the trial of George Zimmerman (the guy who shot and killed Trayvon Martin) in 2013. The left, for all its talk about criminal justice reform, demands mob justice and kangaroo courts for its presumed ideological opponents.
But of all of these, the January 6 committee is worst. At least the impeachments could be said (eventually) to be authorized by the House. The January 6 committee is in violation of its own resolution. And behind the execrable public faces of the charade -- Adam Schiff and Jamie Raskin among them -- are a platoon of lawyers whose participation in this Star Chamber is a further disgrace to an already dubious profession (of which I am a part).
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
