There is a surprising silence around the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. Perhaps that's just because the first day is devoted to opening statements rather than questions; perhaps that's because it's a liberal replacing another liberal, and it will not affect the current balance of the Court; perhaps that's because she's the first black female nominee, and so her confirmation is assured in a way that it would not be for another nominee.
It's also possible that she's met the bar for qualifications, and that Republicans have other irons in the fire. There may be more qualified judges, but Supreme Court justices are rarely the most qualified judges. They're the most qualified who have a reasonably good chance of staying on the bench the longest. I'm sure there are good judges who never get a chance because they started later.
She's very likable; she has a beautiful family; she mentioned God in her opening statement. And she's radical in some of the most destructive ways. But she'll be on the highest court soon, and she'll likely be there for a very, very long time.
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
