Jonathan Turley expressed my sentiments exactly: while radical pro-choice activists theoretically have the right, under the First Amendment, to protest where they want to, we have reached a new low when people are targeting individual Supreme Court justices at their private homes in an effort to influence their judgments. (I also think the pro-lifers who marked to Justice Samuel Alito's home this week to than him for his draft decision were wrong.)
There are laws against disruptive protests during judicial proceedings. I am not sure a protest on a public sidewalk would qualify as a violation; probably not.
However, as Rhoda Kadalie said, in another context: just because you have the right, in theory, to do something, that does not mean it is right for you to do it.
Meanwhile, the execrable Adam Schiff is complaining that the courts do not represent the majority will of the people. There is a legitimate criticism to make regarding what political theorists call the "countermajoritarian" problem with courts. However, that is a feature, not a bug, of an independent judiciary.
This week's show will be slightly different from the norm: we'll focus on clips and topics, rather than guests -- and that, hopefully, will mean more input from the callers (unless you are all watching football on opening weekend).
Topics:
- The state of the economy
- The fight against crime
- The midterm election fight
- The struggle for peace between Russia and Ukraine
- The airstrike on the Venezuelan drug cartel
- The attempt to sink Kennedy
- The war in Gaza
- The case against Harvard
- The Trump presidency
Tune in: SiriusXM Patriot 125, 7-10 p.m. ET / 4-7 p.m. PT
Call: 866-957-2874
This week's Torah portion includes several laws about conduct in civic and personal life, the common theme of which is boundaries -- setting bounds to what one may do at home, at work, and even in the battlefield.
One noteworthy passage concerns Amalek, the evil nation that attacked the Children of Israel as they made their Exodus from slavery to freedom. Deuteronomy 25:17-19 commands Jews to obliterate Amalek's memory.
The South African government accused Israel of genocide on the basis of a story about Amalek in the Book of Samuel, in which King Saul was commanded to wipe out the entire evil Amalekite nation.
Because Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quoted this week's portion -- "Remember what Amalek did to you" (25:17), the South African government claimed he was commanding soldiers to commit genocide.
It was an absurd and malevolent misreading of the Bible and of Jewish tradition. The commandment, as observed by Jews today, is to remember the evil of Amalek and fight ...
