Joel Pollak
Politics • Lifestyle • News • Travel • Writing
I will share my thoughts about American politics, as well as current events in Israel and elsewhere, based on my experiences in the U.S., South Africa, and the Middle East. I will also discuss books and popular culture from the perspective of a somewhat libertarian, religiously observant conservative living in California. I will also share art and ideas that I find useful and helpful, and link to my content at Breitbart News, Amazon, and elsewhere.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Can one use the term 'regime' in referring to Biden?

I have long resisted the use of the term "regime" in referring to any U.S. administration. Rush Limbaugh used to do it in reference to Obama, partly for the shock value, but it was not meant to be taken seriously as a description.

The term "regime" implies a government that is not elected, and therefore illegitimate. That is why I have never used it -- nor do I think it would be appropriate to describe the Biden administration as a regime for that reason.

But there may be other reasons to describe the Biden administration as a "regime" -- as Lee Smith argues in a forthcoming interview this weekend on Breitbart News Sunday (SiriusXM 125, Sunday, August 28, 4-7 p.m. ET).

Smith points to the behavior of the Department of Justice and the FBI over the past several years. The fact that core parts of our civil service -- especially law enforcement -- are now politicized is a key marker of a "regime" society.

What that means is that we are no longer operating according to an independent set of rules, but according to a system in which the party in power can make up the rules as it goes along, even dictating truth and falsehood.

The only way to oppose a regime effectively is to create opposing factions within the regime -- not to support an opposing political party outside the regime itself. Democratic changes, if they come, will be temporary and rare.

Does this sound shocking? What's shocking is how many examples of regime behavior you start to see once you adopt this new frame. President Biden calling the opposition "semi-fascist" is one example; he ran on "unity!"

Another is Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) of New York telling Republicans that if they don't like the way her state is run, they should leave for Florida, where they presumably belong. It's ugly, shocking, and dismisses half the country.

We've seen that kind of rhetoric from both sides -- but rarely pushed with some enthusiasm from people in positions of power, and here the push is coming almost entirely from Democrats. They are sporting for a fight, or a fissure.

Having been a Democrat once, I can speculate that they are likely acting out of the quiet conviction that if you just apply enough pressure, the other side of the country will "evolve" away (since they are presumed to be more primitive).

Then you can get on with the business of governing the country the way you want it to be governed, and frogmarch everyone toward your left-wing utopia (once you can convince the other left-wingers to agree on a single vision).

How about the differential treatment meted out to Black Lives Matter rioters, almost none of whom were prosecuted, much less jailed; and January 6 rioters, some of whom are still sitting in jail awaiting trial, 18 months after the fact?

Still shocked? Ask yourself if a Republican can live openly as such in a liberal neighborhood. Ask yourself if the same is true in reverse -- and why there might be a different answer to those two questions. This is scary stuff.

This is life under the Biden "regime." It's a democratically-elected government -- I'll acknowledge that. What's wrong is that it's not behaving that way. It says it is defending democracy, while it is destroying liberty and crushing opposition.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Time-lapse sunrise at Temescal Falls
00:00:17
This is what is left of my special place in the forest

Burned, then covered in mudslides and rockslides. The river still flows through it. But we have lost so much. I have to believe the spirit still lives on.

00:00:16
The drive home 💔
00:00:46
Breitbart News Sunday: show rundown (July 13, 2025)

This is my first broadcast from the new office and studio in Washington, DC, where I'll be for a couple of years my neighborhood back in L.A. cleans up -- and as we follow the Trump administration from a little closer up than usual.

Topics:

  • The anniversary of the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump
  • The escalating tariff battle with various different trading partners
  • The future of the Middle East peace talks, and ongoing antisemitism
  • The Jeffrey Epstein files and whether they mean anything at all
  • The continued crisis of the Texas floods, and stories of heroism and survival

And more!

Special guests:

  • James Rosen - Newsmax chief Washington correspondent
  • Bob Price - Breitbart News Texas reporter, on the ongoing floods
  • Robert Cahill - Trafalgar Polling, on a new alliance of reliable pollsters
  • Rabbi Yaakov Menken - Coalition for Jewish Values - on Israel & antisemitism

Tune in: 7-10 p.m. ET, 4-7 p.m. PT
Call: 866-957-2874

Weekly Torah reading: Balak (Numbers 22:2 - 25:9)

This week’s portion tells the grand story of the prophet who tried to curse people of Israel and instead ended up blessing them.

I am reminded that these portions continue to be relevant anew, as this particular reading lent the title for Israel’s recent 12 Day War against Iran, “Operation Rising Lion.”

https://www.chabad.org/parshah/torahreading_cdo/aid/2495769/p/complete/jewish/Balak-Torah-Reading.htm

Weekly Torah portion: Chukat (Numbers 19:1 - 22:1)

This week's portion includes the commandment of the red heifer -- one of the classic "irrational" commandments whose fulfillment is an expression of faith. It also includes the regrettable episode in which Moses strikes the rock.

I referred to this story in a wedding speech last night. Why was Moses punished for striking the rock in Numbers, when he struck the rock without incident in Exodus -- both for the purpose of providing water to the people?

The answer is that in the interim, the Jewish people had received the Torah, which is like the marriage contract between the people of Israel and God. In a marriage, you do not resolve things by breaking boundaries, but through love.

The additional reading, from Judges Chapter 11, is the story of Jephthah (Yiftach), a man whom the leaders spurn, but to whom they must turn to save the nation. The parallels to our present political circumstances are striking.

Shabbat Shalom and Happy Fourth of July!

...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals