Joel Pollak
Politics • Lifestyle • News • Travel • Writing
I will share my thoughts about American politics, as well as current events in Israel and elsewhere, based on my experiences in the U.S., South Africa, and the Middle East. I will also discuss books and popular culture from the perspective of a somewhat libertarian, religiously observant conservative living in California. I will also share art and ideas that I find useful and helpful, and link to my content at Breitbart News, Amazon, and elsewhere.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Can one use the term 'regime' in referring to Biden?

I have long resisted the use of the term "regime" in referring to any U.S. administration. Rush Limbaugh used to do it in reference to Obama, partly for the shock value, but it was not meant to be taken seriously as a description.

The term "regime" implies a government that is not elected, and therefore illegitimate. That is why I have never used it -- nor do I think it would be appropriate to describe the Biden administration as a regime for that reason.

But there may be other reasons to describe the Biden administration as a "regime" -- as Lee Smith argues in a forthcoming interview this weekend on Breitbart News Sunday (SiriusXM 125, Sunday, August 28, 4-7 p.m. ET).

Smith points to the behavior of the Department of Justice and the FBI over the past several years. The fact that core parts of our civil service -- especially law enforcement -- are now politicized is a key marker of a "regime" society.

What that means is that we are no longer operating according to an independent set of rules, but according to a system in which the party in power can make up the rules as it goes along, even dictating truth and falsehood.

The only way to oppose a regime effectively is to create opposing factions within the regime -- not to support an opposing political party outside the regime itself. Democratic changes, if they come, will be temporary and rare.

Does this sound shocking? What's shocking is how many examples of regime behavior you start to see once you adopt this new frame. President Biden calling the opposition "semi-fascist" is one example; he ran on "unity!"

Another is Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) of New York telling Republicans that if they don't like the way her state is run, they should leave for Florida, where they presumably belong. It's ugly, shocking, and dismisses half the country.

We've seen that kind of rhetoric from both sides -- but rarely pushed with some enthusiasm from people in positions of power, and here the push is coming almost entirely from Democrats. They are sporting for a fight, or a fissure.

Having been a Democrat once, I can speculate that they are likely acting out of the quiet conviction that if you just apply enough pressure, the other side of the country will "evolve" away (since they are presumed to be more primitive).

Then you can get on with the business of governing the country the way you want it to be governed, and frogmarch everyone toward your left-wing utopia (once you can convince the other left-wingers to agree on a single vision).

How about the differential treatment meted out to Black Lives Matter rioters, almost none of whom were prosecuted, much less jailed; and January 6 rioters, some of whom are still sitting in jail awaiting trial, 18 months after the fact?

Still shocked? Ask yourself if a Republican can live openly as such in a liberal neighborhood. Ask yourself if the same is true in reverse -- and why there might be a different answer to those two questions. This is scary stuff.

This is life under the Biden "regime." It's a democratically-elected government -- I'll acknowledge that. What's wrong is that it's not behaving that way. It says it is defending democracy, while it is destroying liberty and crushing opposition.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Time-lapse sunrise at Temescal Falls
00:00:17
This is what is left of my special place in the forest

Burned, then covered in mudslides and rockslides. The river still flows through it. But we have lost so much. I have to believe the spirit still lives on.

00:00:16
The drive home 💔
00:00:46
Weekly Torah reading: Bamidbar (Numbers Numbers 1:1 - 4:20)

This week'd portion begins the book of Numbers. Interestingly, the Hebrew name for the book is "In the Desert," not "Numbers." The portion, which happens to be my bar mitzvah portion, focuses almost as much on the names of the princes of each tribe as the number of soldiers it fielded. It also focuses on the configuration of the tribal camps around the central Tabernacle and the Levites.

So why "Numbers" instead of "Names" or "Places"? The numbers are, to be sure, a unique feature of the opening of this Biblical book -- but they are not the focus of the rest of the narrative. The Hebrew focuses on the place where the events in the book take place, because essentially this is the narrative of the Israelites' wanderings from Egypt to Israel, across 40 years. We move from the giving of the Torah and the construction of the Tabernacle in Exodus and Leviticus, to the final valediction of Moses in Deuteronomy -- Bamidbar is the story of wandering that happened in between.

The question of ...

Weekly Torah reading: Behar-Bechukotai (Leviticus 25:1 - 27:34)

This week's portion begins with the laws of the Sabbath and the Sabbatical year, and the Jubilee year that restores all land to its original (tribal) owners. It also explores laws of property and labor that will apply in the Land of Israel, and the laws of vows and inheritance.

The Israelites are presented -- not for the last time -- with the essential moral choice that they must face, and the rewards for choosing well, along with the consequences for choosing poorly.

We learn that doing good things will earn God's protection from enemies. That does not mean that victims of terror, God forbid, were sinful. But it does mean that we can respond to evil by committing ourselves to a higher path.

https://www.chabad.org/parshah/torahreading.asp?aid=2495886&jewish=Behar-Bechukotai-Torah-Reading.htm&p=complete

Weekly Torah reading: Emor (Leviticus 21:1 - 24:23)

This week's portion describes the major sacrifices that are to be offered by the Jewish people, including those that are offered only by the priestly Kohen class, and physical requirements of the people (men) who serve in that role.

Inter alia, there are interesting commandments -- such as an injection to treat animals with respect and care, first, by letting a mother animal nurse her offspring for a week before being offered in any sacrifice; and second, by refraining from slaughtering an animal and its offspring on the same day.

The commandments regarding animals remind us of the purpose of those regarding human beings: to uphold a divine connection, through ritual.

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/111878/jewish/Rabbi-Isaac-Luria-The-Ari-Hakodosh.htm

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals