I have long resisted the use of the term "regime" in referring to any U.S. administration. Rush Limbaugh used to do it in reference to Obama, partly for the shock value, but it was not meant to be taken seriously as a description.
The term "regime" implies a government that is not elected, and therefore illegitimate. That is why I have never used it -- nor do I think it would be appropriate to describe the Biden administration as a regime for that reason.
But there may be other reasons to describe the Biden administration as a "regime" -- as Lee Smith argues in a forthcoming interview this weekend on Breitbart News Sunday (SiriusXM 125, Sunday, August 28, 4-7 p.m. ET).
Smith points to the behavior of the Department of Justice and the FBI over the past several years. The fact that core parts of our civil service -- especially law enforcement -- are now politicized is a key marker of a "regime" society.
What that means is that we are no longer operating according to an independent set of rules, but according to a system in which the party in power can make up the rules as it goes along, even dictating truth and falsehood.
The only way to oppose a regime effectively is to create opposing factions within the regime -- not to support an opposing political party outside the regime itself. Democratic changes, if they come, will be temporary and rare.
Does this sound shocking? What's shocking is how many examples of regime behavior you start to see once you adopt this new frame. President Biden calling the opposition "semi-fascist" is one example; he ran on "unity!"
Another is Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) of New York telling Republicans that if they don't like the way her state is run, they should leave for Florida, where they presumably belong. It's ugly, shocking, and dismisses half the country.
We've seen that kind of rhetoric from both sides -- but rarely pushed with some enthusiasm from people in positions of power, and here the push is coming almost entirely from Democrats. They are sporting for a fight, or a fissure.
Having been a Democrat once, I can speculate that they are likely acting out of the quiet conviction that if you just apply enough pressure, the other side of the country will "evolve" away (since they are presumed to be more primitive).
Then you can get on with the business of governing the country the way you want it to be governed, and frogmarch everyone toward your left-wing utopia (once you can convince the other left-wingers to agree on a single vision).
How about the differential treatment meted out to Black Lives Matter rioters, almost none of whom were prosecuted, much less jailed; and January 6 rioters, some of whom are still sitting in jail awaiting trial, 18 months after the fact?
Still shocked? Ask yourself if a Republican can live openly as such in a liberal neighborhood. Ask yourself if the same is true in reverse -- and why there might be a different answer to those two questions. This is scary stuff.
This is life under the Biden "regime." It's a democratically-elected government -- I'll acknowledge that. What's wrong is that it's not behaving that way. It says it is defending democracy, while it is destroying liberty and crushing opposition.
This week's portion elucidates some of the first laws and principles of the Torah that follow the Ten Commandments, including -- a message particularly relevant to freed slaves -- the Jewish restrictions on indentured servitude.
God also provides the basic civil laws of Jewish society, governing almost every area of life -- in this one portion! -- as well as several basic principles of faith and religious observance. Moses then ascends Sinai for 40 days.
One of the laws God gives is the law against taunting a foreigner. This is different from allowing people to enter your land illegally; it is about showing respect, however, for people from other lands and other groups.
I am reminded of the importance of this principle because of the rhetoric lately attacking Elon Musk, a fellow South African-turned-American, for his foreign roots -- often by people who favor illegal immigration, ironically.
...
Since the Palisades Fire on January 7, my posts have been fairly sparse. I have just been so busy -- fighting the fire, covering the fire, helping neighbors, and launching a new podcast, "Three Homeless Guys," with two local friends.
Things are up and down. My family is still displaced, and we haven't resolved our living situation. We are awaiting answers from the insurance company (State Farm) on what they will cover, including alternative living expenses.
There are some incredible opportunities opening up -- more on that later -- and our kids are generally doing well, though this has been hard for them as well (especially the two middle kids, who miss their friends and their house).
The emotion of it all hit me yesterday. Today I feel wrung out. But I also feel that, in a way, going through the fire has been a process of refinement, of re-casting in a new mould, to face new challenges. And to win each new day.
So much to talk about, once again, as the Trump administration continues at breakneck pace. From DOGE chewing through the federal bureaucracy, to Marco Rubio heading out on his first missions for Trump, there's so much...
Special guests:
Assemblyman Carl DeMaio -- on the L.A. fires and reforming CA insurance
Matt Boyle -- Breitbart News political editor, on DOGE and confirmations
Jamie Paige -- founder of the Westside Current, on L.A. politics and the fires
Frances Martel -- Breitbart News foreign editor, on Rubio and Russia/Ukraine
Rob Hersov -- South African commentator, on SA's fight with the White House
Tune in: SiriusXM Patriot 125, 7-10 p.m. ET, 4-7 p.m. PT
Call in: 866-957-2874