This week's portion is one of the most difficult in the entire Torah. It covers many of the laws of war, as well as family and civil law. It also has several admonitions about sexual morality. In short, it is quite a lot to digest at once.
One of the more interesting passages considers the law of the "wayward and rebellious son" in Deuteronomy 21:18-21. The Torah says that in the case of a son who simply will not listen, the entire community is to stone him to death.
That seems harsh -- even barbaric -- and yet I have wondered, as our society is confronted all too often by mass shootings, with so many of the perpetrators being incorrigible young men, whether the Torah understood something.
Namely: that there are always going to be a few young men who, for whatever reason -- family dysfunction, mental illness, evil inclination -- make themselves the enemies of their parents and of the whole of the society around them.
We cannot and should not replicate the Torah's prescribed remedy -- and, indeed, the Jewish Sages suggest it was barely used. But the idea that there might be a capital punishment for rebellion may have helped keep the peace.
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
