You could read it between the lines of the articles on Israeli news websites. Last year, before the election in which a coalition of tiny parties ousted Benjamin Netanyahu, the journalists were eager to see him go, eager for the big drama.
This year, they were subdued. They seemed to know that their old antagonist would return. Though Bibi's replacements had done all right in government, the country lacked strong leadership. They knew he would win, before he did.
Still, Netanyahu's victory is a shock. It is a comeback story for the ages, the story of a man who beat his persecutors. It will also reduce the instability of the last few years, because he will finally have enough of a majority to govern.
The result was made possible by two factors. 1. The case against him fell apart, and prosecutors and police were exposed for using nefarious methods. 2. His replacements lied to their voters; the details are less important than that fact.
U.S. elections don't ride on the outcomes of Israeli votes. But Netanyahu's victory will give encouragement to Republicans, and it outlines the story arc that Donald Trump himself would like to emulate as he returns to the fight.
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
