This double portion covers the ceremony for the annual Day of Atonement (including the sacrifice of the scapegoat, literally a goat upon whom the people's sins are place, and that is then sent away).
It also includes a series of everyday prohibitions, including sexual prohibitions (including homosexuality) -- rules that the people were said, according to legend, to mourn, once they learned about them.
Some rules seem quite contrary to nature, or at least to the deep taboos that seem to be almost instinctive. Others are less so. The people understood they would have to develop restraint themselves.
The Torah thus connects private morality with public destiny -- for the private sins of the people, it warns, could lead to the loss of the land. This is a heavy moral burden, with which each must wrestle.
There is also the rule about treating the "stranger" well -- a passage that is frequently cited to argue that illegal migrants should be welcomed to the country, rather than arrested or deported.
But the "stranger" in the Biblical text does not merely live among the people; he "sojourns" there, with the implication being that he obeys the laws of the people (which is the problem re: illegal immigration).
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
