We're going to default because Biden thinks the playbook that worked last time will work this time, and that he can blame one half of Congress for a responsibility that is shared by the executive.
This worked in an environment where Republicans still feared Wall Street, and where Americans still trusted the media. That gave Obama -- who scuttled a spending agreement -- leverage in 2011.
No one trusts the media, and the Republicans moved first on their own debt limit proposal, which includes a reasonable demand for spending cuts (not the parade of horribles Biden has been citing).
Biden is calculating that Republicans will be blamed for a default. I don't think that is so. People have priced in the Trumpiness of the new, working-class GOP. I think we are headed for the big cliff.
We are about to find out whether it really matters. Biden can try to blame Republicans, but he's the one who refused to negotiate -- after saddling the country with massive, new, unnecessary spending.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
