The debt limit deal is good for the country -- i.e. default is bad -- and great for Republicans, who won on nearly every single important issue. There will be modest spending caps; there will be work requirements for welfare; and the president will co-own the resumption of student loan repayments this fall.
Democrats "won" on issues that were never really issues. Medicare and Social Security were never at risk, for example. President Joe Biden claimed that the GOP were going to kill grandma, cut law enforcement, etc. These were always lies and the claim that Democrats "protected" these priorities is laughable.
On the one hand, Biden created room for himself to reach a deal by creating these false compromises. On the other, by talking up the parade of horribles that would ensue if Republicans failed to capitulate, he also made it impossible for his party to exert any leverage. Refusing to negotiate at the start also hurt.
Republicans "won" in circumstances when they have usually lost -- i.e. having control of just one house of Congress -- because they united around the conservative leadership of Kevin McCarthy, and because -- let's be honest -- Biden is a terrible negotiator. Not the guy you want making deals with China.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
