...sort of. It was a school play, and one of the kids was dressed in drag (a boy, playing a large matron). It was humorous, and harmless, and also a lot of fun.
I think that part of the problem with these debates is that each side is shooting with birdshot rather than range bullets -- hitting a broad sweep of targets when there is really one problem that they are angry about, ensuring an angry reply.
Parents are upset that LGBT activists seem to be sexualizing and indoctrinating kids. LGBT advocates (including some parents) are worried that any expression of alternative sexuality or identity is being attacked, which is a form of bullying.
Theoretically, everyone cares about the kids -- at least, this who are sincerely participating in the debate. But we can't come to an agreement, because kids evoke all kids of protective emotional responses -- and because we're sloppy.
As I was reminded last night, some drag shows in school-- as long as they're not sexual in nature -- are fun, entertaining, and may even serve an educational purpose (in this case, keeping the audience interested in a play about history).
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
