This week's reading records the tragic case of the spies -- the 12 who were sent to scout the Land of Israel, of whom 10 gave a pessimistic report and only two said the land could be conquered as promised.
The Talmud makes an interesting observation about the Spies, noting that they began their evil report by praising the Land of Israel. The lesson: for slander to succeed, it must begin with flattery.
The sin of the spies leads to a devastating punishment: 40 years of wandering in the desert, until the slave generation, with a few exceptions, dies out. God despairs of slaves becoming truly free.
There's a valuable insight in that -- and we see, from postcolonial history, that it takes a generation (or two) for liberated societies to begin to overthrow the corrupt parties that won independence.
To live and govern as free men and women, you have to be able to leave behind the past, and stop seeing yourself as a victim, and be accountable to yourself. Self-victimization leads to wandering.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
