This week features one of the greatest stories of the latter two books of the Torah: the rebellion of Korach, which came after the treachery of the spies and the failure of the people to enter the Land of Israel.
It is not surprising that there might be some resistance to Moses's leadership; after all, the idea he had failed was not so far-fetched. What is curious is that some of Korach's descendants turn out great.
The Prophet Samuel, for example, one of the great moral lights of the Bible, was a descendant of Korach. Chabad.org explains that this is a sign of the power of repentance; we read the additional portion from the Book of Samuel (11:14 - 12:22) in his honor.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/112283/jewish/Samuel.htm
The story from Samuel talks about the rebellion of the people at the end of the age of judges, when they demanded a king. It was a form of insubordination -- but in this case, God blessed the people, even though Samuel was skeptical.
The great insight of Samuel is that the king, too, must be subject to the laws and commandments of God -- but without being a high priest or religious leader. Thus was the rule of law established -- which Korach, Samuel's ancestor, had threatened to disrupt.
That is the true repentance -- one of convictions, not just deeds.
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
