 
                A thought occurred to me while I was snorkeling in the Red Sea yesterday, watching a magnificent and enormous blue triggerfish digging through the stones on the sea floor by a coral reef.
The reef itself, in Eilat, is protected by buoys, to keep snorkelers and scuba divers away -- not that they want to damage the reef, but they can do so accidentally. Reefs are extremely vulnerable.
It occurred to me that it takes a lot of effort to preserve something like that, and the motivation to do so comes from a sense of ownership. We protect what we own, what we consider ours.
Israelis feel they own their country. That leads to some rather intense fights, but it also creates a strong social bond. Most of all, it means they are prepared to defend it and sacrifice for it.
Americans are willing to sacrifice for our country. But we don't act like we own it. That's how we have arrived at a situation in which our government lets millions of people in illegally and nothing is done.
We tell ourselves that the essence of being American is the creed of the Constitution. But is that what people are really willing to die for? Or is it (was it) a sense that this is something that belongs to us?
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...