This week's Torah portion coincides with Rosh Chodesh Adar -- the beginning of the month of Adar, the happiest month of the year. Actually, this year is a Jewish leap year, meaning that we add an extra lunar month (about 29 days) to the calendar so that it stays in rough alignment with the solar calendar. The tradition is that we add a second Adar -- why not have two of the happiest months in a row?
In the Torah portion, Moses conveys the basic framework of civil law as handed down by God. He then ascends Mount Sinai to receive the rest of the law, and will spend 40 days there -- a fateful 40 days...
...He will receive not only the written law, but also the Oral Law. The proof of the existence of the Oral Law is in this very portion, when the Torah talks about "an eye for an eye" and "a tooth for a tooth."
Without the Oral Law to explain that this way of putting this means the monetary value of an eye or a tooth, we would have the barbaric practice of extracting eyes and teeth as punishment.
I love the teachings at the end -- that if you follow all the laws, then all suffering will disappear, even childlessness ... of course this will prove to be almost impossible. But it is a goal to which we aspire.
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
