Far-right extremists have been bullying some conservatives into adopting their positions, which the conservatives are finding easier to do because left-wing groups (like ADL) are already lumping them in with the far-right extremists.
The far-right extremists are also creating a larger audience, especially among the disaffected and de-platformed, which some conservatives are finding an irresistible market, and choosing in place of more mainstream conservatives.
Meanwhile, the left continues to demonize mainstream conservatives, and Christians in particular, driving more mainstream conservatives to empathize with, if not to join, the far-right, and to lash out against the political center.
This is why conservatives are up in arms over a congressional act to define antisemitism when there was zero conservative opposition to Trump when he adopted exactly the same definition of antisemitism via 2019 executive order.
The tragic irony is that this is happening when the left is moving in a brutally antisemitic direction, handing conservatives a rare political opportunity to take power. Jews who were thinking of voting Republican are now thinking again.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
