It's pathetic that the public had to wait more than 5 weeks for an interview with the Democratic Party presidential nominee. It's also frustrating that she went to CNN, which has such a strong bias in her favor and against Donald Trump.
Having said that, I though Dana Bash's questions were (mostly) good, though inadequate, and that the interview gave viewers a fairly good look at both the strengths and the weaknesses of the Harris-Walz ticket, especially the latter.
Harris has no sense of direction. Asked what she would do first as president, she could not give a straight answer. Asked why her policy positions had apparently shifted since she ran for president in 2019, she could not give an explanation.
That said, she has a good sense of the cultural direction of the country -- at least as Democrats want to define it. When Bash invited her to go off on Trump on the topic of race, Harris made a show of holding back, which was clever.
Tim Walz is basically useless. He brings a large body and a coach personality to the ticket. He doesn't add anything. Physically, he is so much larger than Harris (or appeared so) that he makes her look less presidential, at least on TV.
I think the interview was good for Harris, in that she can now say she's done one. I think it was bad for her, in that she looked indecisive. As I explained in my Breitbart column this week, Harris offers "consensus" without leadership. Weak.
This is my first broadcast from the new office and studio in Washington, DC, where I'll be for a couple of years my neighborhood back in L.A. cleans up -- and as we follow the Trump administration from a little closer up than usual.
Topics:
- The anniversary of the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump
- The escalating tariff battle with various different trading partners
- The future of the Middle East peace talks, and ongoing antisemitism
- The Jeffrey Epstein files and whether they mean anything at all
- The continued crisis of the Texas floods, and stories of heroism and survival
And more!
Special guests:
- James Rosen - Newsmax chief Washington correspondent
- Bob Price - Breitbart News Texas reporter, on the ongoing floods
- Robert Cahill - Trafalgar Polling, on a new alliance of reliable pollsters
- Rabbi Yaakov Menken - Coalition for Jewish Values - on Israel & antisemitism
Tune in: 7-10 p.m. ET, 4-7 p.m. PT
Call: 866-957-2874
This week’s portion tells the grand story of the prophet who tried to curse people of Israel and instead ended up blessing them.
I am reminded that these portions continue to be relevant anew, as this particular reading lent the title for Israel’s recent 12 Day War against Iran, “Operation Rising Lion.”
This week's portion includes the commandment of the red heifer -- one of the classic "irrational" commandments whose fulfillment is an expression of faith. It also includes the regrettable episode in which Moses strikes the rock.
I referred to this story in a wedding speech last night. Why was Moses punished for striking the rock in Numbers, when he struck the rock without incident in Exodus -- both for the purpose of providing water to the people?
The answer is that in the interim, the Jewish people had received the Torah, which is like the marriage contract between the people of Israel and God. In a marriage, you do not resolve things by breaking boundaries, but through love.
The additional reading, from Judges Chapter 11, is the story of Jephthah (Yiftach), a man whom the leaders spurn, but to whom they must turn to save the nation. The parallels to our present political circumstances are striking.
Shabbat Shalom and Happy Fourth of July!
...
