On Sunday morning, former President Donald Trump posted an attack on pop star Taylor Swift, signaling that his campaign had begun to unravel.
It was not a surprise that Trump might resent Swift for her endorsement of his rival, Vice President Kamala Harris, but there was absolutely nothing to be gained by saying so publicly.
In doing so, Trump was drawing attention to an endorsement that had made little impact, and possibly alienating some of his supporters.
He was also signaling that he had lost control of himself, and the campaign. This was the Trump of 2020, the undisciplined incumbent who, under attack from all sides, would lash out at rivals and the press, even when he was winning.
We had not seen this version of Trump in years. The "lawfare" against him seemed to have focused his mind even as it also consolidated his Republican support. The 2024 campaign was professional, disciplined, and efficient.
True, the campaign was slow to react to the replacement of President Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket with Vice President Harris. But staffing changes in August seemed to work: Trump tightened his message and stuck to policy.
Sen. JD Vance (R-OH), Trump's running mate, also became an important asset to the campaign, sharpening his skills as he sparred with the media on Sunday morning news shows (which his rival, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, has avoided).
Then came the debate. According to my sources, Trump had appeared in fine form during practice sessions with former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI). But onstage, he was immediately combative, defensive, and ultimately ineffective.
True, he had the moderators against him. But it was not the moderators' fault that he failed to seize on an early Harris mistake, when she dodged a question about whether Americans were better off today than they were 4 years ago.
Give credit to the Harris campaign for preparing a set of talking points designed to get under his skin, including insulting him over his rallies (which she claimed, falsely, are boring). He could have ignored her; instead, he took the bait.
It was not a disaster; he did not insult Kamala Harris personally, or make too many major gaffes. But he failed to use the opportunity to communicate his own message. And Democrats left feeling a boost of confidence in Harris.
The full picture of what happened has begun to emerge. Trump traveled to the debate with Laura Loomer, a provocateur who associates with marginal figures and ideas on the right and somehow insinuated herself into Trump's inner circle.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), a rhetorical bomb-thrower who also likes to provoke opponents (including Republicans), also somehow made it into Mar-a-Lago as Trump was preparing for the crucial debate, and later posted on X about it.
https://x.com/mattgaetz/status/1833596637194948708?s=46&t=l2JVNfY-lbp_LzUHpXhZEA
These voices often flatter Trump and amplify his most incendiary instincts. At a time when he needed to project a calm, presidential demeanor, he was surrounded by at least some people who would have supported the opposite.
Later, after the media declared that Harris had won, it is possible that these were the sources of comfort to which he turned -- the voices that savor battles against the odds. Hence Trump's unhelpful frame of mind on Sunday morning.
The Taylor Swift debacle was quickly forgotten amid news of the attempted assassination. While the shocking event -- the second in just over two months -- was deeply disturbing, it may also have saved the Trump campaign.
The assassination attempt placed Trump once again at the center of public empathy. It also brought out the worst in his media and Democratic opponents, who blamed the intended victim, saying his rhetoric -- not theirs -- was at fault.
That was a reminder of the stakes in November: the same voices that would stoke violence while censoring their political rivals would be fully in charge in a Harris administration. The Democrats were scarier than an unstable Trump.
On Monday, as he returned to campaigning, Trump exuded calm, and issued messages of unity. It was Trump back at his best -- urging supporters to fight, but to fight for all Americans. He appeared to have been shaken out of his funk.
The question is whether Trump will use the opportunity that fate -- or God -- has given him. He needs to get rid of the grifters and groupies and focus on a positive message. It is not enough to point to Harris's weaknesses; he must lead.
This week's portion broadly covers the basic framework of a judicial system, necessary for the functioning of the society that the Israelites were to establish upon entering the Holy Land of Israel -- including "cities of refuge."
These cities were place where those guilty of involuntary manslaughter could flee to escape the righteous vengeance of their victims' families. They would be allowed to return to their homes upon the death of the High Priest.
It is curious that Biblical law is not particularly focused on incarceration, but does include this form of exile and quasi-imprisonment: you are free to leave the city of refuge, but then the "avenger" is entitled to kill you if he finds you.
In that way, the guilty party becomes his or her own jailer -- in a sense, imposing his or her own program of punishment and correction, taking charge of the repentance that is necessary to correct a deep personal flaw.
...
This week, we are tackling two major areas of contention between the Trump administration and Democrat governors: fighting crime, and redistricting. The president is sending the National Guard to blue cities -- and blue states are trying to stamp out Republican representation. Is this a civil war situation?
Special guests:
- Bradley Jaye -- Breitbart News congressional correspondent, on redistricting
- Tom Manza, California Business and Industrial Alliance, on Gavin Newsom
- Jon Fleischman, veteran California political expert, on the special election
- Dan Backer, veteran political lawyer and consultant, on corruption
- DJ Mark Anthony, on a recent visit to Rome and visiting Pope Leo XIV
Tune in: SiriusXM Patriot 125, 7-10 p.m. ET / 4-7 p.m. PT
Call: 866-957-2874
This week's portion is the last of the month of Av -- also known as Menachem (Comforter) Av -- which begins in mourning and ends in celebration and anticipation of the New Year and the process of repentance and renewal.
In a similar vein, the portion features Moses offering the Israelites a choice between a blessing and a curse. They are masters of their own fates: if they obey God's commandments, they receive the blessings -- and vice versa.
The key commandment is to reject idol worship. There is said to be something magnetic about the practice of worshiping idols in the new land, such that it would be constant moral battle, both individually and collectively, in the land.
Nowadays, according to Jewish tradition, humanity has lost the urge for idol worship (and the antidote, which is divine prophecy) -- but there are several near substitutes, such as lust or excessive appetites for worldly pleasures.
We are wired for compulsive behaviors, bad habits, and even addictions. These ...
