In my latest piece at Breitbart, I report that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has called the election result there "the biggest election scam, maybe, in history."
He is referring to the fact that his party, which is the biggest (though well short of a majority), is set to be pushed out of power by a coalition of much smaller parties, led by a tiny party that barely managed 6% of the vote (and is led by his former chief of staff, Naftali Bennett).
The parallels to the 2020 election in the U.S. are interesting. Almost no one is saying the election was "stolen" -- thanks to in-person voting and hand counts -- but there is a sense on the right that the new government is illegitimate. Here are some parallels:
- Politician with almost no support taking power
- Successful incumbent losing office despite massive achievements
- Betrayals by "Never Trump"-type rivals on the same side
- Extreme media bias against the incumbent government
- "Deep State" prosecutors investigating the leader on flimsy charges
- Foreign interference (hello, Biden administration?)
It will be interesting -- and somewhat worrying -- to see where this goes. A crisis of democratic legitimacy is the last thing war-weary Israel needs.
Here's a poll: do you think the new Israeli government will last?
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
