Joel Pollak
Politics • Lifestyle • News • Travel • Writing
I will share my thoughts about American politics, as well as current events in Israel and elsewhere, based on my experiences in the U.S., South Africa, and the Middle East. I will also discuss books and popular culture from the perspective of a somewhat libertarian, religiously observant conservative living in California. I will also share art and ideas that I find useful and helpful, and link to my content at Breitbart News, Amazon, and elsewhere.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
How it ends in Ukraine

The situation in Ukraine remains dire, and it is tough to predict outcomes, given how few people predicted that Putin would send Russian troops into the country in the first place. Nevertheless, I think a likely outcome is emerging, and it is a diplomatic settlement, probably on unfavorable terms for Ukraine.

NATO is not going to war over Ukraine. That's the unfortunate (or fortunate, depending on how you look at it) consequence of the fact that Ukraine is not a member. It's an open question as to whether the U.S. would really go full-bore to defend a NATO member like, say, Turkey, but nonmembers have no chance.

That has consequences for frontline states such as Israel and Taiwan. These are emerging points of instability between the West on the one hand, and Russia/China on the other. Israel has tried to maintain good relations with all of the great powers; Taiwan, obviously, only has the U.S., and it barely has that.

But back to Ukraine. There will be no NATO no-fly zone, nor any other kind of no-fly zone. At the same time, Ukrainian resistance is dug in, and the Russian troops have been taking a beating so far. Putin hasn't yet brought in his biggest weapons, and Ukraine has yet to unleash a full counter-insurgency operation.

Russia's current demands -- no NATO membership, secession of the eastern provinces, recognition of Crimea as part of Russia -- are non-starters, because they are the same demands Ukraine rejected at the start of the war, and they amount to Russia using force to get what it wants, without compromise.

Yet are they reasonable demands? Russia has made clear that it regards NATO membership as a causus belli, and Ukraine isn't a member yet anyway, so it is probably not a major concession. Crimea is effectively part of Russia, sadly, so I'm not sure what Ukraine could hope for there, though recognition is a stretch.

There is probably room for some compromise that retains the breakaway parts of eastern Ukraine while devolving power somewhat, granting them greater regional autonomy. The one thing Ukraine can't accept is the idea that it can just be carved up by force. That is about sovereignty, not just about provinces.

We are in for a lot more fighting before both sides are ready to accept a deal as the best possible alternative to continuing. The cruel irony of war is that only a deal can stop the fighting, but only fighting will bring the two sides to a deal. Until then, Ukraine is basically on its own. Heroically, tragically, on its own.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Time-lapse sunrise at Temescal Falls
00:00:17
This is what is left of my special place in the forest

Burned, then covered in mudslides and rockslides. The river still flows through it. But we have lost so much. I have to believe the spirit still lives on.

00:00:16
The drive home 💔
00:00:46
September 11, 2025

Just want to say I loved your column in the NY Post on Charlie Kirk.

Breitbart News Sunday: show clock (September 7, 2023)

This week's show will be slightly different from the norm: we'll focus on clips and topics, rather than guests -- and that, hopefully, will mean more input from the callers (unless you are all watching football on opening weekend).

Topics:

  • The state of the economy
  • The fight against crime
  • The midterm election fight
  • The struggle for peace between Russia and Ukraine
  • The airstrike on the Venezuelan drug cartel
  • The attempt to sink Kennedy
  • The war in Gaza
  • The case against Harvard
  • The Trump presidency

Tune in: SiriusXM Patriot 125, 7-10 p.m. ET / 4-7 p.m. PT
Call: 866-957-2874

Weekly Torah reading: Ki Teitzei (Deuteronomy 21:10 - 25:19)

This week's Torah portion includes several laws about conduct in civic and personal life, the common theme of which is boundaries -- setting bounds to what one may do at home, at work, and even in the battlefield.

One noteworthy passage concerns Amalek, the evil nation that attacked the Children of Israel as they made their Exodus from slavery to freedom. Deuteronomy 25:17-19 commands Jews to obliterate Amalek's memory.

The South African government accused Israel of genocide on the basis of a story about Amalek in the Book of Samuel, in which King Saul was commanded to wipe out the entire evil Amalekite nation.

Because Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quoted this week's portion -- "Remember what Amalek did to you" (25:17), the South African government claimed he was commanding soldiers to commit genocide.

It was an absurd and malevolent misreading of the Bible and of Jewish tradition. The commandment, as observed by Jews today, is to remember the evil of Amalek and fight ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals