I went to the Gay Pride parade in 1999 as a straight supporter. I went back in 2010 as a congressional candidate. In 2017, I went to the Los Angeles parade as a journalist — and by then, the whole thing had become coldly partisan. They rebranded the Pride parade as “Resist,” and it was all about hating Trump, not standing up for tolerance and for sexual liberation and all that.
I have many thoughts about the whole Pride phenomenon. In college, my friends were the Jews, the blacks, and the gays. I lived (randomly) in Harvard’s gayest dorm, and went to the gay student group’s parties, which were the most free-spirited. At the same time, I remember finding it odd, during a visit to San Francisco in 2001 or so, that they had rainbow flags on all the lampposts on Market Street. It seemed strange to me to celebrate a private preference as civic virtue.
Fast-forward to today. I have many gay friends and some transgender acquaintances in my social circle. My wife and I enjoy (or used to enjoy, before the pandemic) clubs in West Hollywood, L.A.‘s gay neighborhood. Yet I share the common rejection, among conservatives, of the transgender ideology that seeks to undo the basic idea of male and female, and to impose it on children — not for “grooming” (I never bought that) but for long-term political indoctrination.
I see the military, among other institutions, tweeting Pride images. I get that it’s good for recruitment (or is it? How many traditional, Christian, tough-guy recruits are we losing?). I just don’t see what it has to do with the military — or, more to the point, whether it means we have lost the raw, essentially masculine, martial virtues that are necessary in an effective fighting force.
I’m cool with whatever kinky stuff people are into, as long as it’s safe and consensual among adults. I’m cool with people deciding to identify as whatever gender they want to, though I don’t think they should expect that the rest of society must adjust to their shifting preferences (and I draw the line at plural pronouns for individuals). I would like to think there’s room for debate, but the LGBT[…] movement, which used to be about tolerance, has become the most intolerant of all.
This week'd portion begins the book of Numbers. Interestingly, the Hebrew name for the book is "In the Desert," not "Numbers." The portion, which happens to be my bar mitzvah portion, focuses almost as much on the names of the princes of each tribe as the number of soldiers it fielded. It also focuses on the configuration of the tribal camps around the central Tabernacle and the Levites.
So why "Numbers" instead of "Names" or "Places"? The numbers are, to be sure, a unique feature of the opening of this Biblical book -- but they are not the focus of the rest of the narrative. The Hebrew focuses on the place where the events in the book take place, because essentially this is the narrative of the Israelites' wanderings from Egypt to Israel, across 40 years. We move from the giving of the Torah and the construction of the Tabernacle in Exodus and Leviticus, to the final valediction of Moses in Deuteronomy -- Bamidbar is the story of wandering that happened in between.
The question of ...
This week's portion begins with the laws of the Sabbath and the Sabbatical year, and the Jubilee year that restores all land to its original (tribal) owners. It also explores laws of property and labor that will apply in the Land of Israel, and the laws of vows and inheritance.
The Israelites are presented -- not for the last time -- with the essential moral choice that they must face, and the rewards for choosing well, along with the consequences for choosing poorly.
We learn that doing good things will earn God's protection from enemies. That does not mean that victims of terror, God forbid, were sinful. But it does mean that we can respond to evil by committing ourselves to a higher path.
This week's portion describes the major sacrifices that are to be offered by the Jewish people, including those that are offered only by the priestly Kohen class, and physical requirements of the people (men) who serve in that role.
Inter alia, there are interesting commandments -- such as an injection to treat animals with respect and care, first, by letting a mother animal nurse her offspring for a week before being offered in any sacrifice; and second, by refraining from slaughtering an animal and its offspring on the same day.
The commandments regarding animals remind us of the purpose of those regarding human beings: to uphold a divine connection, through ritual.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/111878/jewish/Rabbi-Isaac-Luria-The-Ari-Hakodosh.htm
