Former President Donald Trump is taking. a lot of heat in the Jewish and Israeli press for posting an attack on liberal Jews by JEXIT, a conservative Jewish group urging Jews to abandon the Democratic Party. The attack includes a list of Trump's accomplishments for Israel and the Jewish people, headed by the comment: "Wake Up Sheep. What Nazi / Anti Semite ever did this for the Jewish people or Israel?" The comment appears to be a response to the numerous attacks by liberal Jews against Trump -- and against Jews who voted for him -- that have accused him of being an antisemite, even a Nazi.
Included in Trump's post is the commentary: "Just a quick reminder for liberal Jews who voted to destroy America & Israel because you believed false narratives! Let's hope you learned from your mistake & make better choices moving forward! Happy New Year!" The context, of course, is the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah, on which Jews are meant to reflect on mistakes made in the past and repent for them, committing to improving in the year ahead.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111083021216078581
I don't think it's productive for a presidential candidate to talk this way, but it's not antisemitic. Trump is merely saying openly what some conservative Jews are saying, and have said, to liberal Jews.
Moreover, this is not a fight that Trump-supporting Jews started. For years, Jews who supported Trump -- or even who were deemed to have failed to oppose him loudly enough -- were accused of being accessories to antisemitism. I heard this from people who were formerly close to me; I heard it from anti-Trump Jews on Twitter, e.g.:
https://twitter.com/search?q=joelpollak%20from%3Ajpodhoretz&src=typed_query&f=top
And it didn't start with Trump. In 2008, comedian Sarah Silverman told liberal Jews to make "the Great Schlep" to Florida to canvas among elderly Jewish voters, whom she accused of being too racist to vote for Obama, whether they were Democrats or not.
https://theweek.com/articles/511720/sarah-silvermans-great-schlep
In addition: this is what Trump does: calling out uncomfortable truths. Maybe it's not the best role for a presidential candidate, but it also lets the bullies in the Jewish community know that he has their number.
Finally, it has to be said: Trump is right. No president has done more for the Jewish community, and received less acknowledgment, except from conservative groups like ZOA.
Jewish groups that have attacked Trump have treated it like a free punch, assuming there will be no long-term cost. But as Danny Danon, an Israeli conservative politician with a long history of diplomatic work in the U.S., put it last week in an interview with a Hebrew-language newspaper, leaders like Benjamin Netanyahu need to be more careful about giving Trump credit. For example, if there is to be a Saudi-Israeli peace deal, it must have support from Trump, who could be the next president -- which means that Trump must be given public credit for kicking off the process with the Abraham Accords. Continuing to treat Trump like a pariah, often on spurious grounds, could eventually have serious geopolitical implications.
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
An interesting weekend -- one of the last of Daylight Savings Time -- in which there is much to celebrate, much to contemplate, and a bit to worry about.
The Gaza peace deal is shaky, but holding, after the living hostages returned; the shutdown is still going on, with no end in sight; the China trade war is heating up; and the confrontation with Venezuela continues to escalate.
The "No Kings" protest was a dud, despite the media's attempt to inflate it. What I find fascinating is that the Democrats have basically stolen the rhetoric and the imagery of the Tea Party protests, circa 2009. They claim they are defending the Constitution -- just like the Tea Party did.
On the one hand, this is good. How wonderful to have a political system in which both sides, bitterly opposed though they are, articulate differences through the Constitution -- and not, as in so many other countries, outside it.
On the other, this is sheer hypocrisy for the Democrats. Not only did they malign the Tea Party as ...
