Democrats have deployed "weird" as an insult to attack Sen. JD Vance (R-OH). The word is suddenly constant among left-wing pundits.
Apparently the insult is meant to appeal to young and female voters in particular, for whom "weird" is a catch-all term for everything bad, creepy, or threatening.
But there is nothing immediately "weird" or odd about Vance, save for his beard: there hasn't been a bearded male on a presidential ticket since the late nineteenth century.
The only thing unusual about Vance is his biography. Raised in working-class Appalachia, he overcame the difficult circumstances of his family life. He joined the Marines, graduated from Ohio State, and went on to Yale Law School.
That's not "weird"; that's extraordinary. And it is a journey that the left celebrated before Vance decided to enter the political arena. But suddenly, the elements of that journey are being described as sinister, threatening, and strange.
What is most "weird" about Vance, apparently, is his Christian faith (he embraced Catholicism) and his working-class origins.
To this day, the country's elite struggles to accept the fact that rural working-class voters choose Republicans; they describe it as an odd phenomenon, since they assume that the Democrats' redistributionist policies are better for Vance's constituents than the dignity of jobs in the mines and factories that the climate-change lobby wants to close.
To describe the rural, Christian working class as "weird" is to display a kind of contempt that has become increasingly blatant in the Democratic Party after the Bill Clinton era. It is a classist slur, one that suggests the bicoastal elites to whom "weird" is pitched have no idea who lives in flyover country, who built the heartland. "Weird" turns the rural working class into strangers in their own country.
That is why Trump will win their vote: Democrats deserve to lose it.
This week's show will be slightly different from the norm: we'll focus on clips and topics, rather than guests -- and that, hopefully, will mean more input from the callers (unless you are all watching football on opening weekend).
Topics:
Tune in: SiriusXM Patriot 125, 7-10 p.m. ET / 4-7 p.m. PT
Call: 866-957-2874
This week's Torah portion includes several laws about conduct in civic and personal life, the common theme of which is boundaries -- setting bounds to what one may do at home, at work, and even in the battlefield.
One noteworthy passage concerns Amalek, the evil nation that attacked the Children of Israel as they made their Exodus from slavery to freedom. Deuteronomy 25:17-19 commands Jews to obliterate Amalek's memory.
The South African government accused Israel of genocide on the basis of a story about Amalek in the Book of Samuel, in which King Saul was commanded to wipe out the entire evil Amalekite nation.
Because Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quoted this week's portion -- "Remember what Amalek did to you" (25:17), the South African government claimed he was commanding soldiers to commit genocide.
It was an absurd and malevolent misreading of the Bible and of Jewish tradition. The commandment, as observed by Jews today, is to remember the evil of Amalek and fight ...