This week's portion focuses on the priestly vestments, adornments, and sacrifices, which Aaron and his sons must wear and perform, respectively. It is also the last Sabbath before the holiday of Purim, known as Shabbat Zachor.
That is because we are exhorted to remember how the evil nation of Amalek attacked the Israelites as they left Egypt. (We also read an additional reading from I Samuel about King Saul's war against the Amalekites and their king.)
The connection to Purim is that the bad guy, Haman, was a descendant of Amalek. We are supposed to remember Amalek as a general symbol of injustice, and as a specific antisemitic threat that arises in each generation.
These passages were recently used -- or, really, misread and abused -- against Israel by the South Africans in their case at the International Court of Justice. It was, ironically, proof that Amalek still exists and takes new forms today.
The commandment is not to wipe out Amalek but to remember what Amalek did. That is why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu referred to the story to motivate Israeli soldiers: to remind them of the justice of their mission.
This week’s portion launches the great story of Abraham, who is told to leave everything of his life behind — except his immediate family — and to leave for “the Land that I shall show you.”
There’s something interesting in the fact that Abraham is told to leave his father’s house, as if breaking away from his father’s life — but his father, in fact, began the journey, moving from Ur to Haran (in last week’s portion). His father set a positive example — why should Abraham leave him?
Some obvious answers suggest themselves — adulthood, needing to make one’s own choices, his father not going far enough, etc.
But I think there is another answer. Abraham (known for the moment as Abram) needs to establish his own household. This is not just about making one’s own choice, but really about choosing one’s own starting point. It’s starting over.
Sometimes we start over in fundamental ways even if much that surrounds us remains the same. Sometimes the journey we have to ...
The story of Noah is familiar; the details, less so.
Noah is often seen as an ambivalent figure. He was righteous -- but only for his generation. What was his deficiency?
One answer suggests itself: knowing that the world was about to be flooded, he built an Ark for the animals and for his own family -- but did not try to save anyone else or to convince them to repent and change their ways (the prophet Jonah, later, would share that reluctance).
Abraham, later, would set himself apart by arguing with God -- with the Lord Himself! -- against the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, saying that they should be saved if there were enough righteous people to be found (there were not).
Still, Noah was good enough -- and sometimes, that really is sufficient to save the world. We don't need heroes every time -- just ordinary decency.
Hi all -- as I noted last month, I'm going to be closing down my Locals page, at least for tips and subscriptions -- I may keep the page up and the posts as well, but I'm no longer going to be accepting any kind of payment.
Look for cancelation in the very near future. Thank you for your support!
